Misinformation: How MAGA Figures Are Fueling the Measles Epidemic and Endangering Public Health

The recent report on Third Way’s memo urging Democrats to move away from small-dollar donors is a glaring signal of a larger shift happening within the party—one that threatens to erode the very foundation of grassroots democracy. If the Democratic establishment embraces this approach, it will mark the final stage in a slow but deliberate corporate takeover, effectively transforming the party into a vehicle for elite interests while sidelining the working-class voters it claims to represent. The Facts: Third Way and Corporate Influence Third Way, a neoliberal think tank with deep ties to corporate donors, has long been an advocate for pro-business policies under the guise of centrist pragmatism. Their latest memo asserts that small-dollar donors do not represent the broader electorate, a claim that conveniently ignores the reality that these donors represent the party’s most engaged and motivated base. Instead of proposing alternative ways to energize working-class voters, Third Way...

How Corporate Greed Fuels Poverty, Hunger, and Crime in America America is often called the land of opportunity, but for millions of people, that opportunity feels like a rigged game. While corporations report record-breaking profits, everyday Americans struggle with rising costs, stagnant wages, and an economic system that seems designed to keep them down. The result? A country where hunger, homelessness, and crime are not just personal failures but the direct consequences of unchecked corporate power. The Power of Corporate Overreach Corporations wield enormous influence over laws, policies, and economic structures, prioritizing profits over people. They suppress wages, inflate housing costs, control food prices, and even profit from the very crime their greed creates. Let’s break it down. 1. The Wage Suppression Crisis A livable wage should be a basic right, but for many workers, it’s out of reach. Despite soaring productivity, wages have barely increased in decades. Corpora...

Yes, this is  deeply concerning —and follows a  clear authoritarian pattern  of historical revisionism. Key Takeaways: • Trump’s executive order,  "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,"  aims to  rewrite historical narratives  at the Smithsonian. • The  removal of "divisive, race-centered" history  suggests an  erasure of historical truths —especially regarding race, civil rights, indigenous history, and marginalized communities. • This aligns with past  right-wing efforts to sanitize history , such as: • Florida’s restrictions on  teaching about slavery . • Texas revising textbooks to  downplay Jim Crow & civil rights struggles . • Bans on  DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives  in education. Why This Matters: • Historical erasure  is a classic tactic of  authoritarian regimes  (e.g., Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, China’s censorship). • The Smithsonian, as a  publicly fu...

Yes, this is deeply concerning —and follows a clear authoritarian pattern of historical revisionism. Key Takeaways: • Trump’s executive order, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," aims to rewrite historical narratives at the Smithsonian. • The removal of "divisive, race-centered" history suggests an erasure of historical truths —especially regarding race, civil rights, indigenous history, and marginalized communities. • This aligns with past right-wing efforts to sanitize history , such as: • Florida’s restrictions on teaching about slavery . • Texas revising textbooks to downplay Jim Crow & civil rights struggles . • Bans on DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives in education. Why This Matters: • Historical erasure is a classic tactic of authoritarian regimes (e.g., Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, China’s censorship). • The Smithsonian, as a publicly funded institution , should not be politicized to push an ideological agenda. ...

Chris Hayes: Boy this feels like it’s gotta be pushing the envelope for what’s legal. Projectfactz: Yes, this absolutely should be illegal —and it very likely is. Musk’s post, as described, blatantly violates election laws concerning bribery, voter inducement, and possibly campaign finance regulations. Key Legal Issues: Voter Bribery (Inducement to Vote) Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 597) prohibits offering money or anything of value to induce someone to vote or not vote. Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. § 12.11) specifically criminalizes offering money, gifts, or any inducements in exchange for voting. Campaign Finance Violations If Musk’s $2 million donation is going to a candidate or a political group, it likely exceeds contribution limits and violates campaign finance laws. Even if framed as a “personal appreciation” payment , it could be deemed an illegal in-kind contribution . Coercion & Election Integrity Limiting entrance to a political event only to t...

Summary: European leaders have agreed to increase pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer calling for a deadline to broker a ceasefire and strengthen sanctions. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a UN-supervised transitional government in Ukraine, supposedly to pave the way for elections and peace talks. However, fighting continues, with Russian strikes targeting multiple Ukrainian cities and Ukraine launching drone attacks on Russian territory. The situation remains tense as negotiations and military actions persist. Response: Putin's proposal for UN-supervised transitional governance in Ukraine is nothing more than a smokescreen. It’s a strategic maneuver to stall Western support for Ukraine while securing Russian influence over any so-called "interim government." Given Russia’s track record of violating international agreements—whether in Crimea, Donbas, or beyond—there's no reason to believe he is a...