Misinformation: How MAGA Figures Are Fueling the Measles Epidemic and Endangering Public Health

  From Truth to Profit: How Trump and the GOP Engineered a Market Grift in Broad Daylight By: ProjectFactz @projectfactz.bsky.social April 12, 2025 I. The Setup Wasn't Subtle—It Was Strategic On April 10th, 2025, Donald Trump posted a single word to Truth Social: "BUY." Within minutes, a basket of Trump-tied ETFs and SPACs spiked. This wasn't market confidence; this was manipulation in a red hat. And like clockwork, Speaker Mike Johnson echoed the sentiment, telling Americans, "It’s a great day to invest." What appeared as a spontaneous burst of optimism was anything but. This was a stress test for 2024's political strategy: use Trump's cult of personality not just to rig elections but to rig the markets. II. The Timeline They Hope You Don't Piece Together • 10:30 AM ET: Trump drops the word "BUY" on Truth Social. • 10:45 AM: Trump-linked MAGA ETFs experience an unusual bump. • 11:15 AM: Mike Johnson, flanked by House Repub...

AI said: ​Canada has not canceled a specific battery deal with Tesla or Elon Musk. However, recent developments indicate a significant shift in Canada's stance toward Tesla, particularly concerning electric vehicle (EV) incentives and rebate programs.​Teslarati+3InsideEVs+3New York Post+3 Federal Actions In March 2025, Canada's federal government, under Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland, froze approximately C$43 million in pending rebate payments to Tesla. This decision was prompted by a sudden surge in rebate claims from Tesla dealerships, raising concerns about potential abuse of the Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (iZEV) program. Freeland announced that each claim would be individually reviewed, and Tesla would remain ineligible for future rebates as long as U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports persist .​Reuters+2New York Post+2Business Insider+2The Driven+1Business Insider+1 Provincial Measures Several Canadian provinces have taken steps to exclude Tesl...

https://bsky.app/profile/cwebbonline.com/post/3lmbd4tkt5s2f My observation about Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's recent actions and their potential impact on his support within the Democratic Party is well-founded.  Schumer's decision to vote for a Republican-backed government spending bill in March 2025, aimed at averting a government shutdown, has indeed sparked significant discontent among progressive Democrats. This move was perceived by many as a departure from staunch opposition to Republican policies, leading to internal party criticism. ​Vanity Fair The backlash has been notable, with organizations like Our Revolution reporting that nearly 90% of their surveyed members believe Schumer should step down as Senate minority leader. Additionally, 86% support the idea of a primary challenge against him if he refuses to resign. This sentiment is further echoed by declining favorability ratings; an Economist/YouGov poll from March 2025 indicates that Schumer's net f...

The Supreme Court just handed the executive branch another dangerous tool while pretending it upheld the Constitution.  In a 5–4 decision that undermines meaningful judicial review, the Court vacated emergency orders meant to halt unjust detentions under the long-dormant but deeply authoritarian Alien Enemy Act. Here’s why this matters—and why the so-called defenders of original intent are helping the government erode the very liberties the Constitution was meant to protect. "Roberts et al have divined the Actual Intent of the constitution, which is to allow the government to exercise nearly unaccountable power to strip people of their rights. it is why we fought the revolution! ‪Steve Vladeck‬ ‪@stevevladeck.bsky.social‬ · 2h #BREAKING: 5-4 Court, with Barrett joining the three Dem. appointees in dissent *vacates* Chief Judge Boasberg’s temporary restraining orders in the Alien Enemy Act cases. Judicial review must be available, Court holds, but has to come through habeas petitio...

Jasmine Crockett’s Unapologetic Fight Against Political Hypocrisy By Projectfactz  In an era where political theatrics often overshadow real governance,  Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett  (D-TX) has emerged as a  fearless voice against Republican hypocrisy, political retribution, and injustice . Her confrontations with  Trump-aligned figures, GOP lawmakers, and the Department of Justice  have made her one of the most compelling members of Congress today. Recently, she delivered a  scathing speech in Congress  exposing  what she calls the GOP’s selective enforcement of the law —calling out Republican officials, including  former Florida AG Pam Bondi , for using intimidation tactics to silence critics. But this isn’t the first time Crockett has  pushed back against Republican politicians . Below, we highlight  some of her most powerful moments  where she stood her ground, calling out the  wrong  happening in real-tim...

  The Weaponization of Protection Orders: A Legal Loophole for Abuse and Control Protection orders were designed as a safeguard, a legal mechanism to shield victims from harm and harassment. In cases of domestic violence, stalking, or genuine threats, these orders serve a critical role in ensuring safety. However, what happens when they are abused? What happens when families use protection orders as a weapon—not for protection, but for control, coercion, and punishment? The consequences are devastating, as I have personally experienced. The Personal Cost of a Weaponized Protection Order I am currently living in conditions that most would find inhumane. My sleeping bag and clothes were either stolen or confiscated while I was in court. The few belongings I have left, I cannot even wash. I am struggling to maintain basic hygiene, and as a result, I am getting sick. Despite my pleas for emergency support, I have been met with neglect and indifference. I see others—criminals include...

  Trump’s ‘I’m Joking’ Tactic: A Strategy to Normalize Authoritarianism Donald Trump’s recent comments about seeking a third term should not be brushed off as mere trolling. When asked whether he has been presented with plans that would allow him to seek a third term, Trump responded, “There are methods which you could do it.” When pressed for more details, he simply replied, “no.” This response—casual, ambiguous, yet loaded—fits a well-established pattern: testing the waters for ideas that seem extreme now but could gain traction over time. The Playbook: Say It, Deny It, Normalize It Trump has long employed a strategy where he introduces radical ideas, waits for the backlash (or lack thereof), and then either walks them back or pushes them further. He used this method to normalize election denial, political violence, and the weaponization of government institutions against his enemies. Now, he is applying the same tactic to the possibility of a third term. First, he jokes about it...

The recent report on Third Way’s memo urging Democrats to move away from small-dollar donors is a glaring signal of a larger shift happening within the party—one that threatens to erode the very foundation of grassroots democracy. If the Democratic establishment embraces this approach, it will mark the final stage in a slow but deliberate corporate takeover, effectively transforming the party into a vehicle for elite interests while sidelining the working-class voters it claims to represent. The Facts: Third Way and Corporate Influence Third Way, a neoliberal think tank with deep ties to corporate donors, has long been an advocate for pro-business policies under the guise of centrist pragmatism. Their latest memo asserts that small-dollar donors do not represent the broader electorate, a claim that conveniently ignores the reality that these donors represent the party’s most engaged and motivated base. Instead of proposing alternative ways to energize working-class voters, Third Way...

How Corporate Greed Fuels Poverty, Hunger, and Crime in America America is often called the land of opportunity, but for millions of people, that opportunity feels like a rigged game. While corporations report record-breaking profits, everyday Americans struggle with rising costs, stagnant wages, and an economic system that seems designed to keep them down. The result? A country where hunger, homelessness, and crime are not just personal failures but the direct consequences of unchecked corporate power. The Power of Corporate Overreach Corporations wield enormous influence over laws, policies, and economic structures, prioritizing profits over people. They suppress wages, inflate housing costs, control food prices, and even profit from the very crime their greed creates. Let’s break it down. 1. The Wage Suppression Crisis A livable wage should be a basic right, but for many workers, it’s out of reach. Despite soaring productivity, wages have barely increased in decades. Corpora...

Yes, this is  deeply concerning —and follows a  clear authoritarian pattern  of historical revisionism. Key Takeaways: • Trump’s executive order,  "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,"  aims to  rewrite historical narratives  at the Smithsonian. • The  removal of "divisive, race-centered" history  suggests an  erasure of historical truths —especially regarding race, civil rights, indigenous history, and marginalized communities. • This aligns with past  right-wing efforts to sanitize history , such as: • Florida’s restrictions on  teaching about slavery . • Texas revising textbooks to  downplay Jim Crow & civil rights struggles . • Bans on  DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives  in education. Why This Matters: • Historical erasure  is a classic tactic of  authoritarian regimes  (e.g., Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, China’s censorship). • The Smithsonian, as a  publicly fu...

Yes, this is deeply concerning —and follows a clear authoritarian pattern of historical revisionism. Key Takeaways: • Trump’s executive order, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," aims to rewrite historical narratives at the Smithsonian. • The removal of "divisive, race-centered" history suggests an erasure of historical truths —especially regarding race, civil rights, indigenous history, and marginalized communities. • This aligns with past right-wing efforts to sanitize history , such as: • Florida’s restrictions on teaching about slavery . • Texas revising textbooks to downplay Jim Crow & civil rights struggles . • Bans on DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives in education. Why This Matters: • Historical erasure is a classic tactic of authoritarian regimes (e.g., Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, China’s censorship). • The Smithsonian, as a publicly funded institution , should not be politicized to push an ideological agenda. ...

Chris Hayes: Boy this feels like it’s gotta be pushing the envelope for what’s legal. Projectfactz: Yes, this absolutely should be illegal —and it very likely is. Musk’s post, as described, blatantly violates election laws concerning bribery, voter inducement, and possibly campaign finance regulations. Key Legal Issues: Voter Bribery (Inducement to Vote) Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 597) prohibits offering money or anything of value to induce someone to vote or not vote. Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. § 12.11) specifically criminalizes offering money, gifts, or any inducements in exchange for voting. Campaign Finance Violations If Musk’s $2 million donation is going to a candidate or a political group, it likely exceeds contribution limits and violates campaign finance laws. Even if framed as a “personal appreciation” payment , it could be deemed an illegal in-kind contribution . Coercion & Election Integrity Limiting entrance to a political event only to t...

Summary: European leaders have agreed to increase pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer calling for a deadline to broker a ceasefire and strengthen sanctions. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a UN-supervised transitional government in Ukraine, supposedly to pave the way for elections and peace talks. However, fighting continues, with Russian strikes targeting multiple Ukrainian cities and Ukraine launching drone attacks on Russian territory. The situation remains tense as negotiations and military actions persist. Response: Putin's proposal for UN-supervised transitional governance in Ukraine is nothing more than a smokescreen. It’s a strategic maneuver to stall Western support for Ukraine while securing Russian influence over any so-called "interim government." Given Russia’s track record of violating international agreements—whether in Crimea, Donbas, or beyond—there's no reason to believe he is a...

https://youtu.be/rCsXVBjUB0Q?si=8VY4rTwezsDhq-P0 @tidewatch.bsky.social has added you to the "I Hate Cable News" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:... @r3db34r.bsky.social has added you to the "sycophants, trolls and magats" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:... @kromonos.net has added you to the "homo habilis" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:... @paridaeborb.bsky.social has added you to the "Mosquito repellent" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:... @balkanizetexas.bsky.social has added you to the "nafo gulag" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:... @americanfirewall.bsky.social has added you to the "Americas Firewall" moderation list bsky.app/profile/did:...

Marc Elias' open letter to Elon Musk is a powerful and defiant response to Musk’s dismissive and insulting remarks. There are multiple angles to explore here—Elias' personal history, the broader political implications, and Musk’s alignment with Trump. Let’s break it down. 1. Musk’s Attack: Projection, Deflection, and the Politics of Personal Insults Musk's characterization of Elias and another lawyer as "undermining civilization" is both hyperbolic and ironic. Musk, whose companies have relied on government subsidies, regulatory leniency, and infrastructure funded by taxpayers, now positions himself as a defender of civilization against those fighting for democracy. His comments about “childhood trauma” and “generational trauma” seem like an attempt to discredit Elias emotionally rather than address any substantive issues. This is a common tactic among authoritarian-leaning figures—personalize the attack, discredit the opposition, and avoid engaging with their ...

In a stunning but unsurprising turn of events, Italy has reportedly suspended a $1.6 billion Starlink purchase from SpaceX, citing national security concerns and Elon Musk’s ties to far-right movements, Russia, and Trumpism. This bold decision signals a growing global recognition of Musk as a political and security liability —a conclusion that, frustratingly, the Democratic Party has yet to fully embrace. Europe Takes Action, U.S. Democrats Stay Passive Italy’s move isn’t an isolated case. Across the world, U.S. allies are doing more to check Musk and Trump’s radical influence than American politicians: • Germany and the EU have been aggressive in regulating disinformation and hate speech , directly pressuring Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) to comply with their Digital Services Act. • France and Germany have raised concerns over Musk’s erratic behavior affecting Starlink’s security and role in global conflicts , particularly after his intervention in Ukraine’s drone warfare. • The UK...